HEART Score, an optimal tool for predicting cardiovascular events in chest pain patients in emergency department: a prospective single-center study

Abstract

Objective: Chest pain is a prevalent and potentially life-threatening presentation in emergency departments, necessitating prompt and precise risk stratification to identify patients at high risk, particularly those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study evaluates the predictive accuracy of the HEART score in stratifying short-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) risk among chest pain patients in Bandar Abbas, aiming to enhance clinical decision-making and resource utilization in emergency departments. Method: This prospective observational study was conducted on patients presenting with chest pain at Shahid Mohammadi Hospital’s emergency department. Patients aged ≥18 years with chest pain were included, while those with STEMI or incomplete records were excluded. The HEART score was used for risk stratification, and patients were classified into low, moderate, or high-risk groups. The primary outcome was MACE within six weeks, confirmed via follow-up calls. Data analysis included logistic regression and ROC curve analysis. Result: A total of 1,501 individuals participated in the study, with a mean age of 48.99±14.71 years. Among the participants, 28.6% were diagnosed with MACE. The most common risk factors for MACE included a history of coronary artery disease (79.1%) and hypertension (77.2%). Based on the HEART score, patients were categorized into low-risk (≤ 3), moderate-risk (4-6), and high-risk (≥ 7) groups. The majority of non-MACE patients were classified as low-risk (78.3%), while 65.6% of MACE patients fell into the moderate-risk category. The mean HEART score was significantly higher in the MACE group (5.73±1.68) compared to the non-MACE group (2.31± 1.54). The optimal HEART score cutoff for predicting MACE was determined to be 3.5, with the ROC curve demonstrating strong predictive performance (AUC=0.932). Conclusion: The HEART score is a reliable tool for risk stratification in chest pain patients in the emergency department. Our study shows that a score of ≤ 3.5 indicates low risk, while higher scores predict a greater likelihood of MACE. The HEART score effectively guides clinical decisions, highlighting its high sensitivity and specificity for identifying low- and high-risk patients, making it an essential tool for patient management in emergency settings.

1. Weinstock MB, Weingart S, Orth F, VanFossen D, Kaide C, Anderson J, et al. Risk for clinically relevant adverse cardiac events in patients with chest pain at hospital admission. JAMA internal medicine. 2015;175(7):1207-12.
2. Eisen A, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E. Updates on Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(6):718-30.
3. Fanaroff AC, Rymer JA, Goldstein SA, Simel DL, Newby LK. Does this patient with chest pain have acute coronary syndrome?: the rational clinical examination systematic review. Jama. 2015;314(18):1955-65.
4. Waxman DA, Kanzaria HK, Schriger DL. Unrecognized cardiovascular emergencies among medicare patients. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2018;178(4):477-84.
5. Sandhu AT, Heidenreich PA, Bhattacharya J, Bundorf MK. Cardiovascular testing and clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with chest pain. JAMA internal medicine. 2017;177(8):1175-82.
6. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2016;133(11):1135-47.
7. Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woolard RH, Feldman JA, Beshansky JR, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;342(16):1163-70.
8. Six A, Backus B, Kelder J. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Netherlands Heart Journal. 2008;16:191-6.
9. Gopaul R, Waller RA, Kalayanamitra R, Rucker G, Foy A. Evaluation of Provider Assessment of Clinical History When Using the HEART Score. Open Access Emerg Med. 2022;14:421-8.
10. Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Neth Heart J. 2008;16(6):191-6.
11. Alimohammadi H, Shojaee M, Sohrabi MR, Salahi S. HEART Score in Predicting One-Month Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Acute Chest Pain; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021;9(1):e31.
12. Leite L, Baptista R, Leitão J, Cochicho J, Breda F, Elvas L, et al. Chest pain in the emergency department: risk stratification with Manchester triage system and HEART score. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:48.
13. Backus B, Six A, Kelder J, Bosschaert M, Mast E, Mosterd A, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. International journal of cardiology. 2013;168(3):2153-8.
14. Mahler SA, Hiestand BC, Goff Jr DC, Hoekstra JW, Miller CD. Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events? Critical pathways in cardiology. 2011;10(3):128-33.
15. San Román Arispe IN, Marsal Mora JR, Yuguero Torres O, Bravo MO. A retrospective HEART risk score comparation of acute non-traumatic chest pain patients in an emergency department in Spain. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):23268.
16. Melki D, Jernberg T. HEART score: a simple and useful tool that may lower the proportion of chest pain patients who are admitted. Critical pathways in cardiology. 2013;12(3):127-31.
17. Gharaee R, Zohari Anboohi S, Shiri H, Nasiri M. Comparison of triage effectiveness based on ESI and HEART scale in diagnosis of outcome in patients with chest pain. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2019;21(1):299-305.
18. Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, Bosschaert MA, Mast EG, Mosterd A, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):2153-8.
19. Vahidi E, Beladi M, Abbasian A, Jahanshir A, Seyedhosseini J. Predictive value of HEART score in the outcome of acute coronary syndrome and disposition. Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma. 2022;8(1):19-25.
20. Fox KA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Van de Werf F, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). bmj. 2006;333(7578):1091.
21. Chen X-H, Jiang H-L, Li Y-M, Chan CPY, Mo J-R, Tian C-W, et al. Prognostic values of 4 risk scores in Chinese patients with chest pain: prospective 2-centre cohort study. Medicine. 2016;95(52):e4778.
22. Visser A, Wolthuis A, Breedveld R, ter Avest E. HEART score and clinical gestalt have similar diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing ACS in an unselected population of patients with chest pain presenting in the ED. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2015;32(8):595-600.
23. Han C, Chung H, Lee Y, Jang HY, Cho YS, Park J, et al. The predictive value of HEART score for acute coronary syndrome and significant coronary artery stenosis. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine. 2020;7(4):267.
Files
IssueIn press QRcode
SectionOriginal article
Keywords
HEART Score Major Adverse Cardiac Events Predictive Values

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Jabbari L, Alipour Z, Yazdani R, Tabibzadeh Dzfuli SA, Hayati S. HEART Score, an optimal tool for predicting cardiovascular events in chest pain patients in emergency department: a prospective single-center study. Front Emerg Med. 2026;.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.