Accessibility and regional features of the emergency medical system in Kazakhstan

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the accessibility and performance of emergency medical service (EMS) in Kazakhstan, with a focus on regional disparities and implications for health system development. Methods: A retrospective study on ambulance services in Kazakhstan for 2024 used data from the medical information system. The study found that the ambulance service has 100% automated call management in cities like Astana, Almaty, Shymkent, and 17 regions. The dispatcher processes calls within 5 minutes, categorizing challenges into four types: direct threats to life, potential threats, potential health threats, and acute conditions without danger. The time of arrival for ambulances varies between 10 minutes and 60 minutes. Results: The ambulance service has 20 stations, 96 urban substations, and 195 district offices. 1,499 mobile EMS teams operate in one shift, with a ratio of 18/82. In 2024, 914 city and 585 district brigades operate consultations without team departure, accounting for 10.27% of calls. Kazakhstan has a high proportion of urgent category one calls, accounting for 86% of the total number. This raises concerns about the accuracy of the assessment of urgency, as it may indicate system errors in triage or overloading ambulances with tasks not within their competence.  The Ulytau region, North Kazakhstan, East Kazakhstan, Mangystau, Kyzylorda, and Karaganda regions have the highest percentages of urgent calls (94-96%). The study recorded 8,531,652 calls, with 70.8% coming from urban areas and 29.2% of rural regions. The highest urbanization rates were found in republican significance towns like Almaty, Shymkent, and Astana. In all regions, the distribution of calls between urban and rural areas differs significantly from the overall structure for the country (χ² = 3,210,171.3, P< 0.001). Conclusion: The study shows that Kazakhstan's EMS system has fully automated call management, but regional disparities persist. Urgent category one calls are predominant, with urban areas like Almaty, Astana, and Shymkent generating the majority. This highlights structural imbalances in EMS utilization and calls need improvement in triage protocols, resource allocation, and health system capacity.

1. Liu Q, Xin R, Zhao Y, et al. Dynamic changes of emergency visits: a retrospective observational study. BMC Emerg Med. 2022;22(1):105.
2. Böbel S, Verhoeven J, Scholz M, et al. Strengthening the WHO emergency care systems framework: insights from an integrated, patient-centered approach in the Copenhagen emergency medical services system—a qualitative system analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25(1):401.3. Morales L, McEachern BM, MacPhee RS, Fischer SL. Patient acuity as a determinant of paramedics’ frequency of being exposed to physically demanding work activities. Applied Ergonomics. 2016;56:187-93.
4. Carter AJE, Welsford M. Introducing the CJEM emergency medical services (EMS) series. CJEM. 2015;17(3):279-80.
5. Spek M, Van Charldorp TC, Vinck VV, et al. Displaying concerns within telephone triage conversations of callers with chest discomfort in out-of-hours primary care: a conversation analytic study. Patient Education and Counseling. 2023;113:107770.
6. Hill P, Lederman J, Jonsson D, Bolin P, Vicente V. Understanding EMS response times: a machine learning-based analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025;25(1):143.
7. Søvsø MB, Huibers L, Bech BH, Christensen HC, Christensen MB, Christensen EF. Acute care pathways for patients calling the out-of-hours services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):146.
8. Viereck S, Møller TP, Iversen HK, Christensen H, Lippert F. Medical dispatchers recognise substantial amount of acute stroke during emergency calls. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):89.
9. Schewe JC, Kappler J, Dovermann K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of physician-staffed emergency medical teams: a retrospective observational cohort study of prehospital versus hospital diagnosis in a 10-year interval. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):36.
10. Alanazy ARM, Wark S, Fraser J, Nagle A. Factors impacting patient outcomes associated with use of emergency medical services operating in urban versus rural areas: a systematic review. IJERPH. 2019;16(10):1728.
11. Wiyarta E, Fisher M, Kurniawan M, et al. Global insights on prehospital stroke care: a comprehensive review of challenges and solutions in low- and middle-income countries. JCM. 2024;13(16):4780.
12. Kironji AG, Hodkinson P, De Ramirez SS, et al. Identifying barriers for out of hospital emergency care in low and low-middle income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):291.
13. Khan MAA, Hamid S, Babar ZUD. Pharmacovigilance in high-income countries: current developments and a review of literature. Pharmacy. 2023;11(1):10.
14. Delaney PG, Eisner ZJ, Geduld H. The emergency burden in low and middle-income countries. Surgery. 2024;176(2):528-30.
15. Braun R, Catalani C, Wimbush J, Israelski D. Community health workers and mobile technology: a systematic review of the literature. Bullen C, ed. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65772.
16. Winders WT, Garbern SC, Bills CB, et al. The effects of mobile health on emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04023.
17. Lerner EB, Rea TD, Bobrow BJ, et al. Emergency medical service dispatch cardiopulmonary resuscitation prearrival instructions to improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2012;125(4):648-55.
18. Bakran K, Šribar A, Šerić M, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by trained providers and shorter time to emergency medical team arrival increased patients’ survival rates in Istra County, Croatia: a retrospective study. Croat Med J. 2019;60(4):325-32.
19. Perkins GD, Lockey AS, De Belder MA, Moore F, Weissberg P, Gray H. National initiatives to improve outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in England. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(7):448-51.
20. Razzak J, Usmani MF, Bhutta ZA. Global, regional and national burden of emergency medical diseases using specific emergency disease indicators: analysis of the 2015 global burden of disease study. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(2):e000733.
21. Sheikhalipour Z, Ghahramanian A, Dadashzadeh A, Zadi Akhuleh O, Rahmani F, Fallah M. Factors affecting false calls to prehospital emergency medical services and analyzing the recorded false calls in the dispatch center. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2022;7(2):90-9.
22. Alizadeh R, Panahi F, Saghafinia M, Alizadeh K, Barakati N, Khaje-Daloee M. Impact of trauma dispatch algorithm software on the rate of missions of emergency medical services. Trauma Mon. 2012;17(3):319-22.
23. Iera J, Isonne C, Seghieri C, et al. Availability and key characteristics of national early warning systems for emerging profiles of antimicrobial resistance in high-income countries: systematic review. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025;11:e57457.
Files
IssueIn press QRcode
SectionOriginal article
Keywords
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Kazakhstan Nosology Rural Urban
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Gulzhan A, Galina K, Alexander B, Almaz J, Bakyt U, Ayaganova L, Dyusembayeva Z, Medukhanova S, Bulygin K, Aigul T. Accessibility and regional features of the emergency medical system in Kazakhstan. Front Emerg Med. 2026;.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.