Performance of CARE rule in ruling out acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain: an external validation study

Abstract

Objective: About one out of every 10 patients with chest pain in the emergency department (ED) are finally diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A HEART score of ≤ 3 has been shown to rule out ACS with a low risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurrence. It has been proposed that a negative CARE rule (≤1), which stands for the first four elements of the HEART score and excludes the troponin assay requirement, may have similar rule-out reliability. This study aimed to externally validate the CARE rule. Methods: In this multicenter, observational study a convenience sample consisting of patients over the age of 15 who had at least one troponin study were included. The performance of the CARE rule at the cut-off ≤1 for MACE prediction was assessed and compared to a HEART score of ≤3 and physicians’ gestalt. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, and all-cause mortality in 6 weeks. Results: The data of 154 patients was analyzed. Of these, 121 patients had a negative CARE score of ≤1 and 33 individuals had a positive CARE score. Of those with a negative CARE score, only 1 (3%) experienced an adverse cardiac event while in those with a positive CARE score, 26 individuals (16.88 %) experienced MACE. The sensitivity of the CARE rule was 96.15% and the specificity was 25% with a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.15. The indices for HEART score were 88%, 59.69%, and 0.2, respectively. In comparison, physicians' gestalt had a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 49.22%, and a LR- of 0.08. Of note, utilizing the CARE rule with a cut-off of <3 showed sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 41.86%, and a LR- of 0.1. Conclusion: The CARE rule miss rate in MACE was more than 2% and while its performance was better than the HEART score, physicians’ gestalt outperformed both rules for ruling out MACE.

1. Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, Angelini K, Capewell S, Nicholl J. The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart. 2005;91(2):229-30.
2. Salehi N, Moghadam RH, Rai A, Montazeri N, Azimivghar J, Janjani P, et al. Daily, monthly, and seasonal pattern of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) occurrence in western Iran; a cross-sectional study. Front Emerg Med. 2020;5(3):e28.
3. Greenslade JH, Carlton EW, Van Hise C, Cho E, Hawkins T, Parsonage WA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a new high-sensitivity troponin I assay and five accelerated diagnostic pathways for ruling out acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(4):439-51. e3.
4. Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, Mast TP, van den Akker F, Mast EG, et al. Chest pain in the emergency room: a multicenter validation of the HEART Score. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010;9(3):164-9.
5. Mahler SA, Lenoir KM, Wells BJ, Burke GL, Duncan PW, Case LD, et al. Safely identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge: HEART pathway accelerated diagnostic protocol. Circulation. 2018;138(22):2456-68.
6. Farzadi L, Bagheri-Hariri S, Mehrakizadeh A, Alshaikh FA, Larti F. Echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients and its association with in-hospital diagnosis. Front Emerg Med. 2022;6(2):e17.
7. Brown MD, Wolf SJ, Byyny R, Diercks DB, Gemme SR, Gerardo CJ, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(5):e65-106.
8. Moumneh T, Richard-Jourjon V, Friou E, Prunier F, Soulie-Chavignon C, Choukroun J, et al. Reliability of the CARE rule and the HEART score to rule out an acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain patients. Intern Emerg Med. 2018;13(7):1111-9.
9. Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Neth Heart J. 2008;16(6):191-6.
10. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(16):1581-98.
11. Kline JA, Johnson CL, Pollack CV, Diercks DB, Hollander JE, Newgard CD, et al. Pretest probability assessment derived from attribute matching. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:26.
12. Than M, Herbert M, Flaws D, Cullen L, Hess E, Hollander JE, et al. What is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the emergency department?: a clinical survey. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166(3):752-4.
13. E Backus B, J Six A, H Kelder J, B Gibler W, L Moll F, A Doevendans P. Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011;7(1):2-8.
14. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):e139-228.
15. Liu N, Ng JC, Ting CE, Sakamoto JT, Ho AF, Koh ZX, et al. Clinical scores for risk stratification of chest pain patients in the emergency department: an updated systematic review. J Emerg Crit Care Med. 2018;2:16.
16. Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W, Rochwerg B, Taljaard M, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, et al. Prognostic accuracy of the HEART score for prediction of major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with chest pain: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26(2):140-51.
17. Laureano-Phillips J, Robinson RD, Aryal S, Blair S, Wilson D, Boyd K, et al. HEART score risk stratification of low-risk chest pain patients in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;74(2):187-203.
18. Stopyra JP, Harper WS, Higgins TJ, Prokesova JV, Winslow JE, Nelson RD, et al. Prehospital modified heart score predictive of 30-day adverse cardiac events. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):58-62.
19. Smith LM, Ashburn NP, Snavely AC, Stopyra JP, Lenoir KM, Wells BJ, et al. Identification of very low-risk acute chest pain patients without troponin testing. Emerg Med J. 2020;37(11):690-5.
20. Oliver G, Reynard C, Morris N, Body R. Can emergency physician gestalt “rule in” or “rule out” acute coronary syndrome: validation in a multicenter prospective diagnostic cohort study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):24-30.
21. Body R, Cook G, Burrows G, Carley S, Lewis PS. Can emergency physicians ‘rule in’ and ‘rule out’ acute myocardial infarction with clinical judgement? Emerg Med J. 2014;31(11):872-6.
22. Braiteh N, Rehman WU, Alom M, Skovira V, Breiteh N, Rehman I, et al. Decrease in acute coronary syndrome presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic in upstate New York. Am Heart J. 2020;226:147-51.
23. Garcia S, Albaghdadi MS, Meraj PM, Schmidt C, Garberich R, Jaffer FA, et al. Reduction in ST-segment elevation cardiac catheterization laboratory activations in the United States during COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(22):2871-2.
Files
IssueVol 6 No 4 (2022): Autumn (October) QRcode
SectionOriginal article
DOI 10.18502/fem.v6i4.10432
Keywords
CARE Rule Chest Pain Clinical Decision Rules
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Abbasian A, Farshidpour L, Chegin M, Mirkarimi T, Doosti-Irani A, Mirfazaelian H. Performance of CARE rule in ruling out acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain: an external validation study. Front Emerg Med. 2022;6(4):e49.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)